What Does The Juan Williams Firing Mean? It Shows How Tightly Controlled The Mainstream Media Really Is

The Juan Williams firing by NPR over remarks that he made on The O'Reilly Factor has gotten a ton of attention on the mainstream news since it happened.  So what does the Juan Williams firing mean?  Well, certainly Juan Williams had the right to say what he did.  And certainly NPR had the right to fire Juan Williams for what he said.  Also, there is little doubt that it is time to completely pull all federal funding from NPR.  But the real significance of the Juan Williams firing is that it shows just how tightly controlled the mainstream media really is.  Over the past several years, reporter after reporter across the nation has been fired for getting just slightly off the politically-correct script that they are all supposed to follow.  In American today, those reporting the news are not allowed to think for themselves.  They must tell us what they are told to say.

In the video posted below, Juan Williams responds to his firing by NPR....



Sadly, the vast majority of what we see, hear and read today is controlled by just a handful of monolithic media corporations.  For much more on this phenomenon, we urge you to read the following article....

"Who Owns The Media? The 6 Monolithic Corporations That Control Almost Everything We Watch, Hear And Read"

If you are interested in doing even deeper research into how tightly controlled the media is, then we would recommend the following books....

#1 Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News

#2 A Slobbering Love Affair: The True (And Pathetic) Story of the Torrid Romance Between Barack Obama and the Mainstream Media

#3 Arrogance: Rescuing America From The Media Elite

Also, please don't forget to visit some of our other websites....

The Debt - A Blog About The Debt We Owe To Our Founding Fathers, To Those Who Have Fought And Died For America And To Future Generations

How To Get Out Of Debt - Practical Tips And Advice That Will Help You Learn How To Get Out Of Debt
 
Foreclosure Help - Tips, Information And Foreclosure Help For Those Seeking To Save, Buy Or Sell Foreclosed Homes

Unique Gift Ideas - A Guide To Finding The Most Unique Gift Ideas

What Does The Bible Say? -  Have You Been Wondering What The Bible Has To Say About A Particular Subject? We Are Here To Help Answer Those Questions

In A Guide On Terrorism And Extremism The Department Of Justice Lists Constitutionalists And Survivalists Alongside Al-Qaeda And The Aryan Brotherhood

Another document has emerged that shows exactly what the U.S. government thinks about the patriot movement.  A recently discovered Department of Justice guide on terrorism and extremism actually lists "constitutionalists" and "survivalists" alongside Al-Qaeda and the Aryan Brotherhood.  Apparently believing in the U.S. Constitution or preparing for the difficult economic times that are coming is enough to be labeled as an extremist these days.  The guide, the cover of which you can see at the top of the article, is 120 pages long and it is entitled "Investigating Terrorism and Criminal Extremism – Terms and Concepts".  You can read a full copy of this report right here.  The guide describes itself as "a glossary designed primarily as a tool for criminal justice professionals to enhance their understanding of words relating to extremist terminology, phrases, activities, symbols, organizations, and selected names that they may encounter while conducting criminal investigations or prosecutions of members of extremist organizations."

It is a sad day for America when the U.S. government starts labeling American citizens as potential criminals and terrorists just because they have a different political view than the majority.  This is the kind of thing that happened under Hitler, Stalin and Mao.  But it is happening in the United States in 2010.  People are being branded as terrorists and extremists simply based on their political speech.

The following definitions come straight out of the report....

Patriot Movement: The “patriot” movement is a general term used by its members to describe the collective movements and individuals on the extreme right wing. In one form or another, this practice dates back many decades; in the 1930s, many on the far right referred to themselves as “superpatriots.” In the 1960s and 1970s, it was common to refer to the “Christian Patriot” movement, but this term is less common now than then. Among the types of individuals that can be found within the “patriot” movement are white supremacists, sovereign citizens, tax protesters, militia members, and sometimes antiabortion or anti-environmental groups.

Constitutionalists: A generic term for members of the “patriot” movement. It is now often used to refer to members of the sovereign citizen or common law court movement. Sometimes the word “constitutionist” is also used.

Survivalists: The survivalist movement feared a coming collapse of civilization, generally as the result of nuclear war, and tried to prepare themselves to survive it. Survivalists typically stockpiled food, water, and weapons, especially the latter, and instructed themselves on topics ranging from first aid to childbirth to edible plants.

New World Order: A term used by conspiracy theorists to refer to a global conspiracy designed to implement worldwide socialism.

Information Warfare: Synonymous with cyberwarfare, information warfare is the offensive and defensive use of information and information systems to deny, exploit, corrupt, or destroy an adversary’s information, information-based processes, information systems, and computer-based networks while protecting one’s own. Such actions are designed to achieve advantages over military or business adversaries.

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR): Along with the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral Commission, one of the three key groups that conspiracy theorists claim operate behind the scenes to control the world and to establish the “New World Order.”

Bilderbergers (Bilderberg Group): Along with the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations, one of the three groups targeted by right-wing extremists for conspiring to dominate the world.

Keep in mind that these terms are listed alongside "Al-Qaeda" and "the Aryan Brotherhood" in the guide.  It is clear that the Department of Justice considers "patriots", "anti-abortion groups", "constitutionalists" and anyone concerned about a "New World Order" to be extremists just like members of "Al-Qaeda" are considered to be extremists.

Are you starting to get the picture?

This is disgusting.  Please contact your representatives and express your outrage over this report.  All the authors of this report deserve to lose their jobs. 

This kind of demonization of political speech is horribly anti-American and has no place in our republic.  Hopefully some of the major mainstream media networks will pick up on this report and make it a huge story, because it deserves to be one.

If you enjoy this blog, we encourage you to check out our new website: American Dream.

Also, for much more on "the New World Order", we recommend that you check out the following resources....

#1) Shadow Government: How the Secret Global Elite Is Using Surveillance Against You

#2) Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement

#3) Fall Of The Republic: The Presidency Of Barack H. Obama

The Denver Airport: Why The Cloak Of Secrecy And All The Bizarre Symbology?

The following is a great two part documentary on the many odd happenings in and around the new international airport in Denver, Colorado.

If you do not know about the Denver Airport already, then you should definitely check these videos out. It is most definitely the most bizarre airport in the world, and there is an unexplained cloak of secrecy around the construction and operation of this airport that persists to this day.

This documentary does a great job of explaining the meanings of the bizarre symbology around the airport and it asks some important questions about what is going on underneath the airport, as well as around it.

If you are anything like us, the more you learn about the new Denver airport, the more unanswered questions you are likely to have? Will we ever get all the answers?

Part I:



Part II:

Democrat Activists Are Already Informing On Obama Opponents

Imagine a nation where the president of that country recruits thousands of supporters who are willing to inform on anyone who opposes his plans. What would such a nation be like?

Perhaps you are envisioning a backwards third world nation that is ruled by a totalitarian dictator dressed up in a funny looking military uniform.

But that it not what we are talking about.

We are talking about the United States of America.

On the official website of the White House, the Obama administration is asking supporters to inform them of anything they see or hear that is "fishy" - even if it is in casual conversation with their own family and friends:

"There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov."

Since when did it become okay for the White House to ask people to "inform" on others?

Is this the United States of America or is this Nazi Germany?

Senator John Cornyn of Texas was so disturbed when he heard about this that he actually sent a letter to Obama. Cornyn correctly recognized that this type of "flagging" of individual citizens sets a very dangerous precedent:

"By requesting that citizens send 'fishy' emails to the White House, it is inevitable that the names, email addresses, IP addresses, and private speech of U.S. citizens will be reported to the White House."

But Cornyn was is not the only member of Congress that is extremely concerned.

"If you get an e-mail from your neighbor and it doesn't sound right, send it to the White House?" Fox News quotes Senator John Barasso from Wyoming as saying. "People, I think all across America are going to say is this 1984? What is happening here? Is big brother watching?"

The sad thing is it appears that these concerns are more than warranted. Already some Democratic activists have been more than eager to "flag" even their own family and friends.

Just consider the following quotes from the Democratic Underground website.....

"Just sent one from my whackadoo cousin"

"Forwarded her msg to the flag email address while I copied her on it....BURN!"

"I turned in my sister. That felt good."

Here are some more quotes from another location on that same Democratic website.....

"Enough of the talk...we need to get busy and start putting together a databank of healthcare opponents."

"I sent in two flags and found two others to send in flags as well."

"The more reports sent to the White House the better!"

The United States was supposed to be the one nation where this kind of thing could never happen.

America was supposed to be the home of the good guys - the ones fighting the tyranny of Nazi Germany and the U.S.S.R.

But if we start informing on one another and helping our leaders compile "enemies lists", then what does that say about us?

The hour is late my friends.

Tax And Socialize: Barack Obama's Health Care Nightmare

In the U.S. Senate today, the health committee voted 13-10 along party lines to advance a horrific "tax and socialize" health care bill. Not only would this bill give the U.S. government unprecedented control over a socialized health care system, but it would also be one of the largest tax increases in American history.

It has been said that Democrats can't wait to get their hands into your pockets in order to take your money, but it usually turns out that whatever money they are able to grab from the American people, the reality is that they end up wanting to spend even more than that.

In fact, a preliminary analysis from the Congressional Budget Office reveals that the version of the "tax and socialize" health care bill being pushed in the House of Representatives would cause federal deficits to go through the roof.

The CBO report estimates that the 10 year increase in federal deficits from the health care bill would be just over 1 trillion dollars:

"On a preliminary basis ... the proposal's provisions affecting health insurance coverage would result in a net increase in federal deficits of $1,042 billion for fiscal years 2010 through 2019."

Not only would it send federal deficits soaring, but the "tax and socialize" plan being pushed by Democrats also has these wonderful features:

*It would REQUIRE all Americans to buy health insurance. Americans who refuse to buy health insurance will be hit with heavy fines of more than $1,000. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that these draconian fines will raise around 36 billion dollars over 10 years.

*It would create a government-run insurance program to compete with private health insurance.

*It would implement a 5.4 percent tax increase on individuals making more than $1 million a year, with a gradual tax beginning at $280,000 for individuals.

Republican Representative Roy Blunt from Missouri summed it up when he said this about the bill: "What we really have here is a bill that, without any question, will kill jobs, will limit access to health care, will raise taxes and will lead to a government takeover of health care."

When many Americans hear the words "health care reform" they seem to think that they will be getting free health care.

But that is not the case at all.

Instead, it is going to mean that they are forced to buy health insurance, it is going to mean that the U.S. government will control their health decisions and it is even going to mean that the U.S. government is going to decide who lives and who dies.

Health care run by the government also means mandatory vaccinations. The CDC is now saying that the U.S. may need 600 million doses of swine flu vaccine in order to vaccinate every man, woman and child in the United States this fall.

In the future, if your national health record shows that you have not taken the mandatory vaccines, then you will not be able to get any more health care until you do.

But there are even more frightening health care changes that the Congress passed earlier this year.

The truth is that the Democrats inserted provisions into one of the economic "stimulus" bills that gave the federal government COMPLETE control over your health care under a nationalized health care plan.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, otherwise known as "the economic stimulus bill" contained almost all of the key elements of Tom Daschle's ideal nationalized health care system that he outlined in his 2008 book, Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.

In his book, Daschle wrote that doctors will have to “learn to operate less like solo practitioners” and be willing to accept mandatory government controls and guidelines.

And guess what?

That is precisely what that bill now forces doctors to do.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created a brand new bureaucracy called the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology. This new government organization will monitor all medical treatments to make sure that your doctor is prescribing the exact drugs and medical treatments that the U.S. government believes are "appropriate" and "cost effective".

So much for medical freedom, eh?

The bill also radically changed the way that the health care system treats the elderly.

Currently, Medicare pays for medical treatments for the elderly that are considered to be safe and effective.

But that has all changed.

Now, a cost effectiveness standard set by a Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research will apply.

So now if the U.S. government officials decide that it isn't cost effective for your mother to get cancer treatment she will be out of luck.

In her recent editorial, Betsy McCaughey described Daschle's attitude towards the elderly in his book:

He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

She also goes on to describe how this new "council" would actually make choices to deny health care to elderly patients if they don't have enough "productive" years left:

The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.

Do you understand what that means?

It means that now the United States government decides who lives and who dies.

But most Americans seem tickled pink that they are about to get the "free health care" that Obama supposedly promised them. Instead, they are going to find out that they are going to be forced to pay for mandatory health care, that their health care decisions are now totally controlled by the federal government and that many of them have just been hit with crushing tax increases in order to pay for it all.

The U.S. Military Forbids Active Duty Troops From Sharing The Gospel Of Jesus Christ

Did you know that the U.S. military forbids active duty troops from sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ? Did you know that the U.S. military has admittedly burned Bibles? The truth is that the United States is increasingly becoming an openly anti-Christian institution, and that should be of great concern for all of us.

Most American Christians are totally shocked when they learn that active duty troops in Afghanistan and Iraq are absolutely banned from sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ with anyone. U.S. Central Command's "General Order Number One" absolutely forbids any active duty troops from trying to convert people to any religion.

That means that all of those Muslims that the U.S. military is "liberating" are absolutely prohibited from hearing about Jesus Christ from the people who are supposed to be helping them.

But not only that, the U.S. military has also admittedly burned Bibles.

That's right.

Stacks of Bibles that were printed in the two most common Afghan languages and that had been sent to Afghanistan were burned by the U.S. military because there was fear that they would get off the base and ultimately convert some of the Afghans.

Oh, the horror!

What hope are we bringing to these people if we forbid the spreading of the gospel of Jesus Christ?

"The decision was made that it was a 'force protection' measure to throw them away, because, if they did get out, it could be perceived by Afghans that the U.S. government or the U.S. military was trying to convert Muslims," Lt. Col. Mark Wright told CNN.

A CNN report about this Bible burning is posted below.....



As stunning as this report was, the truth is that it is only part of a larger campaign by the U.S. military to repress religious expression.

Just consider the U.S. army regulation below.....

"Distinctive religious symbols, such as crosses, crucifixes, the Star of David, menorah, and other religious symbols, will not be affixed or displayed permanently on the chapel exterior or grounds."

(Army Reg. 165-1, 13-3.d)

The truth is that it is the official policy of the U.S. Army to tear down crosses and other Christian symbols from their chapels worldwide.

And we wonder why the U.S. military is not blessed anymore.

In another incident last year, a U.S. marine was handing out coins to Iraqis that had a positive message about Christianity on them.

So how did the U.S. military respond when they learned of this?

They removed that marine from duty as fast as they could.

The U.S. military can't seem to stop the terror attacks over there, but they sure seem to be effective in stamping out any expression of Christianity as quickly as possible.

The U.S. military may be fighting in the name of someone's "god", but they are making it abundantly clear what God that they do not follow.

The Cap And Trade Climate Change Bill

The U.S. House of Representatives is on the verge of voting on the cap and trade climate change bill which if passed would fundamentally change the American economy forever. The Democrats added a 300 page amendment at 3 a.m. last night, and Republicans say that the Democrats are ramrodding this bill through the House without enough time for any of the members to possibly read the bill.

Most Republicans are firmly opposed to this bill and are calling the measure a "job killer" that would push energy bills through the roof and would drive jobs and businesses overseas.

But this cap and trade climate change bill is a top priority for the White House, and Barack Obama spent much of the day making phone calls trying to drum up support for the bill.

"Now is the time for us to lead," Obama told reporters in the White House Rose Garden. "We cannot be afraid of the future. We cannot be prisoners to the past."

This legislation is also very important to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and she has pledged to get it passed before Congress leaves for their July 4th vacation.

Representative Mike Pence from Indiana said that this bill "amounts to the largest tax increase in American history under the guise of climate change."

Fortunately, House Minority Leader John Boehner is delaying the attempt by the Democrats to ramrod this bill through by filibustering. He is actually reading page-by-page through the 300-page Democratic amendment to the bill.

Earlier, Boehner had some very harsh words for the bill. In fact, he said that he had "never seen anything this ridiculous".

Check out this video clip of Boehner.....



During his filibuster Boehner made these very wise remarks: "...the gentleman’s had his 30 years to put this bill together. And the House is going to spend a whopping five hours debating the most profound piece of legislation to come to this floor in 100 years. And the chairman has the audacity to drop a 300-plus page amendment in the hopper at 3:09 a.m. this morning. And so I would ask my colleagues, don’t you think the American people expect us to understand what’s in this bill before we vote on it?"

The truth is that the whole notion that "global warming" is caused by carbon dioxide is complete nonsense.

Dr. Tim Ball, a renowned environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg, makes it abundantly clear that carbon dioxide cannot possibly cause "global warming":

"CO2 is about 1.5 the density of air. One of the great fallacies promoted by [the proponents of the global warming theory] is that CO2 is well and quickly mixed through the atmosphere. It isn't. They also argue that the CO2 is most effective in trapping heat from the Earth (infrared) at the top of the atmosphere. This is why the computer models predicted greatest warming at the top of the atmosphere over the tropics. The problem is the actual measurements show that is not happening."

In addition, the "global warming" that the world experienced during the 90s and into this decade was experienced by every planet in the solar system. It was caused by the sun. Now that the sun has recently gone into a time of low sun spots, the truth is that the world is now experiencing a time of global cooling.

But the facts never seemed to matter much to American politicians before. Why should they let the truth bother them now?

But even if global warming was caused by carbon dioxide (which it is not), this bill will not cut emissions. It will just drive jobs and businesses overseas to places like China where they have no limits on carbon emissions at all.

Can the fragile American economy endure the higher gasoline costs and the massive loss of jobs and businesses that this bill would cause?

Can the fragile American economy endure the largest tax increase in the history of the United States?

Contact your representatives in Congress and tell them to vote NO on this bill. The future of the U.S. economy is at stake.

The U.N. Census Plan To GPS Map Every Human Dwelling On Earth

Many Americans have been startled to find a U.S. census representative at their door this year using a GPS device to digitally mark the location of their home. The reality is that this is not just an American plan, but rather a newly uncovered United Nations document reveals that it is part of a U.N. scheme to use GPS technology to identify every human dwelling on earth.

The use of GPS to track where you live in not something that the Obama administration came up with. A U.N. document entitled "Integration of GPS, Digital Imagery and GIS with Census Mapping" by the United Nations Statistics Division reveals that the U.N. has a much bigger plan than just GPS mapping all of the homes in the United States and Europe.

The U.N. wants to GPS map every house, hut and hovel in the world.

You can read this disturbing document here:

http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/meetings/egm/CensusEGM04/docs/AC98_14.pdf

In particular, pay attention to pages 4 through 6.

When you think through the implications of all this, it can be pretty mind boggling.

If the United Nations is able to achieve this, then there will be NOWHERE on earth that is "off the grid". You will not be able to "hide" anywhere. Big brother will ALWAYS be able to identify you.

Already in the United States all of this GPS mapping of the front doors of homes is causing some pretty intense confrontations between home owners and census workers. Just check out this YouTube video.....



The facts are that the U.S. government has hired an army of approximately 140,000 census workers in part with a $700 million taxpayer-funded contract to GPS map every single front door in the United States.

Every single front door.

When some home owners have chased them away, the census workers have responded by telling them that someone else will come back again until they get what they need.

Census spokesman Stephen Buckner told this to WorldNetDaily: "We have to verify every single address."

So to everyone who thought that they could go "off the grid" and hide from the government it looks like you were sadly mistaken.

You are going to be part of the Big Brother police state grid whether you like it or not.

And when the government decides it is time to round up troublemakers, they are going to know exactly where you are and a computer will lead them right to your front door.

The potential for abuse of this kind of GPS database is staggering.

Even if you trust that your information will never, ever be abused, the reality that news stories are coming out almost constantly about how the government is watching, tracking, tracing and controlling us like never before in our history should be incredibly disturbing to the vast majority of Americans.

What is it going to take for people to realize that we are heading towards a totalitarian "Big Brother" police state that will make the novel 1984 look like a Sunday picnic?

Gates, Buffett, Winfrey Attend Secret NYC Population Control Summit

On May 5th, Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey and a number of other "super wealthy" Americans gathered for a secret meeting in Manhattan. Reportedly the goal of the meeting was to consider how their combined wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population.

There was a COMPLETE blackout by the American news media of this clandestine gathering. They reportedly met at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and the president of Rockefeller University. The secret meeting was supposed to be so discreet that many of the billionaires’ aides were only told they were at "security briefings".

However, some details about this secret meeting have emerged.

According to one major U.K. newspaper, one person who attended the meeting said that "a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat."

The same news article includes some incredibly disturbing quotes about the meeting from that same anonymous source.....

"This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers."

"They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming."

In other words, these rich elitists are the ones who will provide the "big-brain" answers that the rest of us morons are not capable of coming up with.

The truth is that this secret meeting is just the latest example of the obsession that the global elite has with population control.

It seems that now there is almost a non-stop propaganda campaign in the western world to promote abortion, sterilization, family size limits, lower birth rates and other even more draconian population control measures.

One of the most recent shocking comments on population control came from the U.K. government's "green guru".

The chair of the U.K. government's Sustainable Development Commission, Jonathon Porritt, said that parents who have more than two children are being “irresponsible” by creating an "unbearable" burden on the environment.

Porritt also says that curbing population growth through abortion and contraception are absolutely necessary in order to fight global warming.

When government officials begin talking of limits on family sizes it is time for alarm bells to start going off.

The truth is that the freedom to marry and reproduce and to raise a family is one of the most cherished and most basic of all human freedoms.

But the global elite have become absolutely obsessed with population control, and their sick obsession is starting to reveal itself in society in a thousand different ways.

For most of human history, the thought of the government or anyone else restricting how many children one could have was absolutely unthinkable.

However, today there are many, particularly in the Western world, who are been convinced by government propaganda to willingly restrict their own reproductive capabilities.

One 27 year old woman named Toni Vernelli told the Daily Mail why she decided to get permanently sterilized: "Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population."

Some activists have even gone to the absolute extreme by forming "The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement" which seeks to reduce the presence of humanity on earth as much as possible.

Their motto is: “May we live long and die out”.

Doesn't that sound lovely?

So is the ballooning population of planet earth a huge threat to the environment?

Do we need to implement strict population controls for the good of mankind?

The reality is that the world has more people than it ever has had in all of recorded history. Some countries have implemented population laws that are quite strict (such as China's one child policy), while other nations do not have any mandatory population regulations yet. Lately, however, we have started to see some population control measures begin to pop up in the Western world.....

*Women in the Netherlands who are deemed by the state to be unfit mothers will be sentenced to take contraception for a period of two years, according to a new bill before the Dutch parliament.

*In the U.K., one influential think tank says that it is an "eco-crime" to have too many children and that we really need to examine the impact our large population is having on the earth.

*In South America, the government of Peru goes door to door pressuring women to be sterilized and they are funded by American tax dollars to do this.

Did you know that was what your tax dollars were doing?

The truth is that the desire by the global elite to limit the population of the earth has been around for a long, long time. Between 1798-1826, English economist Thomas Malthus published six editions of his work entitled "Essay on the Principle of Population", which argued that population growth inevitably outstrips food production.

The primary argument advanced by Malthus was that the English working class was poor not because they were exploited, but rather because there were too many of them. Malthus opposed welfare and higher wages because he believed they would allow the poor to survive and breed, thus compounding the overpopulation problem and leading to more poverty. Of course Malthus was terribly wrong about all of this, but nonetheless his theories gained wide acceptance among the English elite of his day.

Many years later, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, vigorously promoted this type of twisted thinking in the United States. The following is one of Margaret Sanger's most infamous quotes:

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

Remember, that quote came out of the mouth of the founder of Planned Parenthood.

Unfortunately, the sick theories of Malthus, Sanger and other population control advocates did not die out. Rather, they seemed to gain steam as the population of the world absolutely exploded in the 20th century.

U.S. environmentalist Paul Erlich, in his 1968 book entitled "The Population Bomb", argued for very strict population control measures, especially in the poorer areas of the world. He warned that if we did not implement such measures we would be facing catastrophic problems very quickly.

Dr. Arne Schiotz, World Wildlife Fund Director of Conservation, said this in 1984:

"Malthus has been vindicated, reality is finally catching up with Malthus. The Third World is overpopulated, it’s an economic mess, and there’s no way they could get out of it with this fast-growing population. Our philosophy is: back to the village."

Unfortunately, the philosophies of Erlich, Schiotz and other population control advocates have garnered a substantial following even among powerful members of the United States government. Just check out the following shocking quotes.....

“There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…."

“Our program in El Salvador didn’t work. The infrastructure was not there to support it. There were just too goddamned many people…. To really reduce population, quickly, you have to pull all the males into the fighting and you have to kill significant numbers of fertile age females…."

“The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa, or through disease like the Black Death….”

–Thomas Ferguson, State Department Office of Population Affairs

The quotes above are typical of the mindset of the global elite. The call for radical population control has grown louder than ever before. College professors are given standing ovations by their students when they call for a 90 percent reduction in the human population of the planet. Ted Turner said, "A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal," and the global elite applauded him for it. The Georgia Guidestones which call for us to "maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature" are increasingly cited by our leaders as an important, and perhaps even necessary, goal.

What in the world is happening?

How in the world did it become a good idea to get rid of 90 to 95 percent of us?

It seems as though for the global elite, every major crisis these days is an opportunity to further one of the key pillars of their agenda.....

Population reduction.

Problem #1: Gas costs too much and we are faced with "global warming".

Answer: Get rid of a whole bunch of people and we will use less gas and we will produce less "greenhouse gases".

Problem #2: Medical costs are soaring out of control.

Answer: Get rid of a whole bunch of people and kill off the elderly and we will have fewer medical costs.

Now Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, has the perfect solution for the "food crisis":

Get rid of a whole bunch of people......

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article3908588.ece

The following is one of Prince Philip's most famous quotes about world population:

"You cannot keep a bigger flock of sheep than you are capable of feeding. In other words conservation may involve culling in order to keep a balance between the relative numbers in each species within any particular habitat. I realize this is a very touchy subject, but the fact remains that mankind is part of the living world…. Every new acre brought into cultivation means another acre denied to wild species."

Do you realize how the global elite sees us?

They see us as a "flock of sheep" that must be culled from time to time.

How sick is that?

Prince Philip, the "Eco-Warrior", also once said that he would like to come back to earth as a disease after he died to help reduce the human population.

But he is far from alone on this issue. The call for human depopulation is coming from a myriad of other sources:

John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London has said this: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet."

He also made this shocking statement: “The greatest thing anyone in Britain could do to help the future of the planet would be to have one less child.”

Now there are influential think tanks in the United Kingdom that are even advocating that the U.K. adopt a "2 child" policy to help fight "global warming".

The infamous Club of Rome certainly is clear about who they think the enemy is.....

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."

–Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991

Mikhail Gorbachev made the following stunning statement about the population of the earth: "We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren't enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage."

The reality is that we are getting increasingly closer to the kind of world where the "useless eaters" that Henry Kissinger talked about will be "eliminated". Is this the kind of future that we want for us and our children?

The truth is that the world is not experiencing runaway population growth. While the earth's population is growing, the rate of growth is definitely slowing. The population of the world grew by 140% between 1950 and 2000. However, authorities predict a rise of only 50% between 2000 and 2050, and a rise of just 11% in the 50 years after that.

The truly frightening thing is that many of you who will read this article actually agree with this radical depopulation agenda.

Many of you actually think it is a good idea to exterminate 90 to 95 percent of us.

Many of you have embraced the radical eugenics philosophy promoted by some of the wickedest men of the 20th century and you don't even realize it.

I challenge anyone who believes in radical population control to post a comment below defending your position.

For the rest of us, we need to understand what the global elite intend to do before the time comes when they actually start doing it to us.

HR 1388 Bans National Service Participants From Sharing Christ

Following the overwhelming passage of "The Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act" by the House of Representatives last week, the U.S. Senate voted 74 to 14 on a procedural move that essentially guarantees that a mandatory national service bill will be passed by the Senate.

"National service" sounds great until you realize exactly what is in this bill. The House version of this bill includes a provision that bans all national service participants from being involved in any form of evangelism.

The "GIVE" Act was passed in the House by a 321-105 margin. You can find the full text of the bill here:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-1388

Section 125(a)(7) of the House version of the bill prohibits the following:

Engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of religious proselytization.

So the U.S. government plans to create a massive horde of young people who are serving the United States who will be banned from serving the Lord Jesus Christ and from sharing the gospel with their friends.

Talk about the secularization of American society - a bill which seeks to get countless thousands of young Americans involved in "national service" and which will prohibit them from serving God.

What kind of insanity is this?

The truth is that the economy is a mess, wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and in several other covert locations have stretched the U.S. military beyond the breaking point, and many American cities need to be rebuilt. So now the Obama administration will use the cheap, conscripted labor of young people to get things fixed.

It's called involuntary servitude.

But this is what some in the Obama administration have been eyeing for quite some time.

Barack Obama's new chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, is the coauthor of a book that calls for, among other things, compulsory national service for all Americans between the ages of 18 to 25.

The following quotes are from pages 61-62 of the book Emanuel coauthored in 2006 entitled "The Plan: Big Ideas for America":

It's time for a real Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us. We propose universal civilian service for every young American. Under this plan, All Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation and community service. ...

Here's how it would work. Young people will know that between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five, the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service. They'll be asked to report for three months of basic civil defense training in their state or community, where they will learn what to do in the event of biochemical, nuclear or conventional attack; how to assist others in an evacuation; how to respond when a levee breaks or we're hit by a natural disaster. These young people will be available to address their communities' most pressing needs.

Now keep in mind that the person who wrote that is going to be the new White House chief of staff.

Wow.

The frightening thing is that it looks like some of Emanuel's ideas are already being implemented by the new administration.

The official website of President-Elect Obama, Change.gov, originally announced that Obama would soon "require" that all students in middle school all the way through college would be forced to participate in community service programs.

Fortunately, the Internet exploded with outrage, and the website's wording was quickly softened.

But before the change, this is what Obama's website said about this program: "Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year."

I think that we have had enough of "Patriot acts" and I know that most young Americans do not want to be part of any kind of a draft.

How many of you would willingly submit to mandatory national service?

What would YOU do if you got drafted into the U.S. military?

The U.S. government is taking more control over our lives than ever before, and still most American seem like they could care less.

Body Scanners

The TSA has begun installing super sensitive body scanners in airports across the United States that can look under your clothing for guns, knives and whatever else the feds want to see.

Imagine a futuristic world where security is so tight that just to take a flight you have to be scanned by a machine that can look under your clothes and give security officers a perfect look at the precise form of your naked body - including your private parts. Well, the future is now.

You might not be so eager to take that next flight after you read this.

"Body scanners" that give operators a very clear image of what is underneath your clothing have replaced metal detectors at Tulsa's airport.

We wanted to put up a picture of what these "body scans" look like, but we were hesitant because they actually do border on pornography. These body scans are the closest thing to viewing a person's naked body without actually seeing their skin.

Officials in Australia where they have installed similar machines confess that these machines DO show people's private parts.

Cheryl Johnson, the general manager of the Office of Transport Security in Australia, admitted the following about these machines: "It will show the private parts of people, but what we've decided is that we're not going to blur those out, because it severely limits the detection capabilities."

She also added this comment: "It is possible to see genitals and breasts while they're going through the machine, though."

But all in the name of "security", eh? Now to board a plane you have to subject yourself to having one or more "security" guards view the naked form of your body.

Tulsa International Airport is just the first airport where these body scanners will be tested in the United States.

San Francisco, Las Vegas, Miami, Albuquerque and Salt Lake City will join the body scanning test in the next two months.

According to ABC News, the TSA plans to install 600 of these machines in airports across the nation this year.

Since the announcement there has basically been NO outcry by the public.

Are any of you upset by this? Have we become so dehumanized and so domesticated that we are not even upset that a bunch of "security officers" get to oggle our naked bodies before we can get on an airplane?

HR 875: The End Of Organic Farming?

Many small farmers and organic food activists are claiming that if H.R. 875 is passed, it will mean the end of organic farming in the United States.

H.R. 875 was introduced by Democrat Rosa DeLauro in February. Her introduction of this bill represents a stunning conflict of interest, because her husband, Stanley Greenburg, works for Monsanto. Monsanto is the world's biggest producer of herbicides and genetically engineered seeds, and they would GREATLY benefit if thousands of small organic farmers were put out of business, because organic farmers don't use Monsanto products.

H.R. 875 is called the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 and you can find the full text of the bill here:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-875

This horrific bill would establish a "Food Safety Administration" within the Department of Health and Human Services. The mandate of this new department would be "to protect the public health by preventing food-borne illness, ensuring the safety of food, improving research on contaminants leading to food-borne illness, and improving security of food from intentional contamination, and for other purposes."

Section 3 of H.R. 875 defines what type of establishments would be subject to the regulations in this legislation. It that section, a "food production facility" is defined this way:

The term ‘food production facility’ means any farm, ranch, orchard, vineyard, aquaculture facility, or confined animal-feeding operation.

So that would include.....

*All organic farms
*All small farms
*All family farms
*Even small family gardens if you sell any produce to your neighbor at all

If you read this bill, you will see that it gives the government the power to regulate what is "safe" farming, and therefore if organic farmers are not using enough herbicide on their plants to be "safe" or they aren't following the same "quality control" procedures as the big guys they could be instantly put out of business.

In addition, it loads small farmers with massive amounts of paperwork and administrative burdens that the big corporations can handle but they can't.

That is how you put a horde of small competitors out of business - you get the government to pile on the rules and burdens and regulations until they collapse.

That is why Monsanto desperately wants this bill. They hate the small farmers and they want to take them out of the picture.

If you care about organic farming, please call Congress and tell them to stop this horrible bill.

New Government Plan Would Put RFID Chip In All Driver's Licenses

A shocking new U.S. government plan would embed an RFID chip in all driver's licenses. Just when privacy advocates thought that the REAL ID program was dead, the federal government has come up with something far worse.

If this proposal is implemented, the U.S. government would be able to electronically track nearly every adult citizen wherever they go. The possibilities for abuse of such a system are endless. For example, the government would be able to compile attendance lists at anti-government rallies just by walking through the crowd with an ID reader.

This very disturbing proposal actually has the support of Janet Napolitano, the new head of the Department of Homeland Security. Instead of calling them REAL IDs, these new licenses would be called "enhanced driver's licenses".

The Department of Homeland Security even has a web page up about these "enhanced driver's licenses". On that page they even admit that a RFID chip that "will signal a computer to pull up your biographic and biometric data" and tell the government agent all of your personal details.

Do you all find this disturbing yet?

Of course this is not the Mark of the Beast yet, but it is another step in that direction. Someday the antichrist will require that all the people of the world take an identification mark in their right hand or their forehead, and those who do not take it will be killed.

Already, RFID implants are being used in humans with alarming frequency. For instance, RFID implants are being implanted in older Americans living with Alzheimer's disease who are at risk of wandering off. RFID human implants are also being used in some places to store the medical records of patients who are chronically ill so that doctors can get their information quickly in an emergency.

While those uses may sound "good" to a degree, the reality is that the primary use of this technology is to create a "Big Brother" society where everything that you do is tracked, traced and watched by the government. Every time this technology expands, it brings us closer to that day that we read about in the book of Revelation.

Let us hope that Americans will unite and oppose this proposal just as they opposed the READ ID Act.





-----

"A FEMA For The Internet", "Internet 2" & The Loss Of Internet Freedom

The future of the Internet has never been as dark as it is today. In response to unprecedented security breakdowns, some government officials are proposing a "FEMA for the Internet" at the same time as the Clean Slate project at Stanford University is building the architecture for a completely new Internet where you will give up your Internet freedom and anonymity for increased security and safety.

A "FEMA for the Internet"?

Is that really true?

Yes, it is.

Former White House cybersecurity official Paul B. Kurtz, one of the leading candidates to become President Obama's "cyber czar", is proposing that a "FEMA for the Internet" be created.

Under Kurtz's plan, the Defense Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Federal Communications Commission would oversee "the security of the Internet" under the direction of a newly created national cybersecurity center.

Already your Internet anonymity is almost totally gone as the NSA is establishing the infrastructure to track what every single American does on the Internet. One can only imagine how much more power a "FEMA for the Internet" would wield.

Meanwhile, the New York Times is asking this question: Do We Need A New Internet?

Of course what they are referring to is the current effort to build a faster, more secure Internet called Internet 2. The following quote from the New York Times article is particularly chilling.....

What a new Internet might look like is still widely debated, but one alternative would, in effect, create a “gated community” where users would give up their anonymity and certain freedoms in return for safety.

Do you think all of this is far off?

The Clean Slate project at Stanford University is currently creating a system to make it possible to slide a more advanced network (Internet 2) quietly underneath today’s Internet. By the end of this upcoming summer, this new Internet will be running on eight campus networks around the United States.

But the United States is not the only government seeking greater control over cyberspace.

Governments around the world have gotten a taste for Internet censorship and they like it. Through the use of mandatory filters and new "cybercrime laws", Internet freedom is being crushed around the world like never before.

*In February, New Zealand will implement Section 92 of their Copyright Amendment Act which allows the government to immediately disconnect someone from the Internet if they are even accused of illegal file sharing.

*The new mandatory Internet filter being imposed on the people of Australia is so restrictive that it is being called "The Great Firewall of Australia".

*In China, the new year has brought a severe crackdown on websites and search engines that offer material that the Chinese government decides is "too vulgar" or "too subversive" for the Chinese people to see.

*Internet activists in Thailand are getting increasingly upset by efforts of that government to censor the Internet in that country.

*A new set of laws in India is so brutal that it will allow a government official to break in to someone's home to check if they were surfing porn, and it will allow the government of India to block any website they want for any reason.

The Internet has truly been one of the greatest advances in communication in the history of the world. For the past few years, we all have experienced an era of unlimited, high speed Internet with the freedom to say almost anything we have wanted to. It has been a golden age for the Internet, but every golden age ends, and the golden age of the Internet is now being crushed by repressive governments all over the globe.

So will we see such restrictive measures in the United States soon?

While such repressive measures as a mandatory filter have not been imposed yet, we have been seeing more limits and restrictions on Internet usage.

Many of these subtle restrictions are very quietly being put into place.....

On November 1st, AT&T, the largest U.S. Internet provider, began testing limits that would curb Internet usage for customers whose video and music downloads are flooding their network.

Are fundamental changes to our beloved Internet on the horizon? Are we about to face increased restrictions regarding what we can say on the Internet even in the U.S.? Unfortunately, the answer to all of these questions is very clearly yes, and the following are ten reasons why the golden age of the Internet is ending:

#1) Once one or two large Internet providers get away with putting a cap on Internet use all of the other providers will follow very quickly. Now that Comcast has announced a hard cap on Internet use, it is only a matter of time until more Internet providers follow suit.

#2) Bandwidth is very expensive. With the explosion of online gaming and the massive increase of Internet users downloading video and music files, there has been a huge increase in the average bandwidth utilized by the average consumer. Bandwidth costs money, and those costs have to be passed on to the consumer somehow.

#3) There has never been a greater information tool than the Internet in the history of the world. The free flow of information that has resulted has given a lot of power to the people of the world. Many governments around the world, including the Western establishment, do not like this one bit. Increased censorship and other types of "Internet reform" are being introduced in order to curtail our freedom of speech to a more acceptable level.

#4) Greed. Every single day health insurance companies deny healthcare to sick people in the United States and they make billions of dollars doing it. Why? Because they can. Now that we have all become addicted to the Internet do you think Internet providers will not get greedy? The reality is that they already are getting greedy.

#5) This is all part of the plan to transition us over to Internet 2, which will be much more heavily restricted and controlled.

#6) Canada's new Internet subscription model appeals to a lot of powerful interests. What some Internet providers in Canada are getting ready to do is to provide Internet service on a subscription model similar to how cable television service is provided. In other words, your "package" will include 400 or 500 of the top websites, and if you want more than that you will have to pay for it.

#7) Up until now, the Internet has largely avoided taxation. However, with governments increasingly looking at significant shortfalls, it is only a matter of time before some politicians look at the Internet as a great source of tax revenue.

#8) The world is heading for incredibly difficult economic times, and when the economy crashes you won't get anything "for free".

#9) Giant media companies are sick and tired of giving away their media for free. Huge newspapers are going broke, movie companies are losing revenue, news organizations have lost control over the flow of information and the "small guy" is finding a way to carve out a bigger piece of the pie. Giant media organizations desperately want their power and control back.

#10) Most people in modern society are sheep, and they will pay whatever someone tells them to pay, and they will passively accept whatever controls and restrictions are put on them without even a whimper.

Hopefully this last point is wrong and more people will stand up and will have the backbone to fight for their rights.

The future of the Internet may depend on it.



-----

U.K. Energy Experts Will Visit EVERY Home To "Help Them Go Green"

In the U.K., you are going to be "environmentally friendly" whether you like it or not. Under a new government plan, energy experts in the U.K. are going to visit every home in the country in order to "help them go green".

It is being called "The Great British Refurb" and it is part of a sweeping U.K. government plan to reduce carbon emissions.

Ed Miliband, the Energy and Climate Change Secretary, has announced that teams of "energy advisers" will go "house by house, street by street" to tell people what they must do in order to become eco-friendly.

It looks like Big Brother's cousin, "Green Brother", has arrived in the U.K.

So who is expected to pay for all of these improvements?

The homeowners.

Well, yes, there are going to be "loans" and "tax incentives", but in the end it is the homeowners who will be expected to foot the bill.

While becoming more "eco-friendly" is a goal that many people have, it is troubling the degree to which governments in the western world are now controlling our lives.

They tell us what kind of light bulbs we can use, how much tomato must be in our tomato sauce and increasingly even what we can say and think.

The truth is that those of us in the western world don't live in "free" societies any longer. We are regulated and controlled in a thousand different ways.

Even though it is now the year 2009, the reality is that every day we take one more step towards 1984.

Big Brother Is Watching

In our previous article entitled "The NSA's Black Widow Is Watching ALL Your Calls & Emails", we discussed how the NSA literally has a supercomputer that scans millions of calls, emails and other electronic communications each day.

But that is yesterday's news.

Now the NSA is creating an artificial intelligence system called "Aquaint" that will literally pull information from thousands of databases to figure out not only what you are doing, but also what you are thinking.

Aquaint ("Advanced QUestion Answering for INTelligence") is being designed to pull information from your phone calls, credit card receipts, social networks such as Facebook and MySpace, GPS devices, cell phones, Google searches, Amazon book purchases and even E-Z Pass toll records to give users of the system information on where you are, what you are doing and what you are thinking.

Oh, you didn't think that the government could do that?

Oh, you didn't think that the government was ALLOWED to do that?

Guess again.

Welcome to the 21st century - the century of Big Brother.

Acquaint is so incredibly intrusive that at least one researcher has left the project because of concerns about what it is becoming.

Imagine what a technology like this could mean if it fell into the wrong hands.

For some time we have been saying that we are nearing the end of the "open society".

Every day we sink deeper towards a scientific technocracy where "Big Brother" will rule all, but people do not seem to care.

Did you know that there is a new Google application called Google Latitude that you can use to track your friends through their cell phones wherever they go?

So now you can be "Big Brother" too!

But of course your friends can track and trace you too.

Isn't that fun?

The reality is that Google knows way more about you than you would dare to think.

Someday technologies such as this will not only be able to determine what you are doing, saying and thinking, but they will also be able to control you as well.

The reality is that we are moving into times that science fiction writers never even dreamed of.

Big Brother is watching.

Are you ready?

New Bill Will Turn Old Military Bases Into FEMA Camps

On January 22nd, Representative Alcee Hastings [D-FL] introduced a new bill in the U.S. House of Representatives called the National Emergency Centers Act (also known as HR 645).

If Congress passes this bill, the Department of Homeland Security will be REQUIRED to establish national emergency centers (FEMA camps) on closed military bases.

For years, mainstream apologists have tried to deny that the government was putting together a network of FEMA detention camps across the United States. But now the wording of this new law would require that closed military bases be converted into Homeland Security "emergency centers". Just check out this language from the bill: "Wherever possible, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate a closed military installation as a site for a national emergency center."

You can see the entire text of this new bill here:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-645

Let's take a look at some of the specific language in this bill.....

"In accordance with the requirements of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations."

This law would require that AT LEAST 6 FEMA camps be established on military installations around the United States. But it does not set a maximum. So the number of FEMA camps established under this law could be 6 or it could be 60.

"(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security."

This language gives the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to use these FEMA camps for any purpose that he or she wishes. That is a truly sobering thought.

".....capable of meeting for an extended period of time the housing, health, transportation, education, public works, humanitarian and other transition needs of a large number of individuals affected by an emergency or major disaster"

Note that the law would require that these FEMA camps be able to house (or imprison?) large populations for an extended period of time. There camps are not just being set up as command and control centers - they are being designed to hold "a large number of individuals".

".....capable of hosting the infrastructure necessary to rapidly adjust to temporary housing"

Once again we see that these FEMA camps specifically have the purpose of "housing" people.

(c) Location of National Emergency Centers- There shall be established not fewer than one national emergency center in each of the following areas:

(1) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions I, II, and III.

(2) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IV.

(3) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions V and VII.

(4) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VI.

(5) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions VIII and X.

(6) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IX.

Please note that the law REQUIRES that at least one of these FEMA camps be established in specific FEMA regions.

Which FEMA region do YOU live in?

If the Secretaries of Homeland Security and Defense jointly determine that there is not a sufficient number of closed military installations that meet the requirements of subsections (b) and (c), the Secretaries shall jointly designate portions of existing military installations other than closed military installations as national emergency centers.

This part of the bill actually requires the use of an active military base for a FEMA camp if there are not enough closed military bases to do the job.

Where do you think the FEMA camp closest to your house will be established?

Are you ready to go to a "national emergency center" when the government declares martial law?

What will your response be if they come to put you on a train that will take you and your family to one of these camps?

But you know what one of the saddest things is?

The machinery of martial law is being put into place, and the American people are hardly uttering a peep in protest.

YES Or NO: Will You Take The Chip When They Come For You?

Under the National Animal Identification System (NAIS), the FDA is going to start requiring the microchipping of certain types of farm animals and livestock. The homeless, hospital patients and employees of certain corporations are being microchipped in some areas of the United States. This is a technology that is spreading and is not going to go away. What will you do when one day they come to chip you?

Will you take a microchip someday when the government requires you to do so?

Please answer YES or NO and feel free to explain your answer in the comments section below.

Will you willingly take the chip when they come for you?

It may be really easy to resist it when they introduce it on a voluntary basis at first.

But will you resist it when you cannot have a bank account without it?

Will you resist when you cannot buy or sell without it?

What will you do?

Where will you live?

How will you buy food?

Will you resist when they start putting people without the chip into camps?

Will you resist when they start waterboarding you?

What about when they threaten to put a nail through your eye?

What about when they put you in a cramped, windowless cell and they turn out all the lights and they let dozens of hungry rats in?

What about when they start torturing your children right in front of you?

Will you still resist then?

Will you still resist when they threaten to burn all of your skin off with acid and then throw you into a blazing fire?

Is it worth it for you to resist?

Why not just make things easy on yourself and take the chip and then you can stay in your house and buy and sell and you can go to work and live normally and the new world order will get of your back?

Perhaps you think that you will never have to face such a choice.

But the Bible says that everyone will face this kind of a choice in the end times.

It will be known as "the Mark of the Beast" and we don't know exactly what form it will take, but Revelation 13:16-17 tells us that if you do not have it on your right hand or your forehead you will not be able to buy or sell without it.....

He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

Revelation 14:9-11 tells us the ultimate destiny for ANYONE who takes the Mark of the Beast:

A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: "If anyone worships the beast and his image and receives his mark on the forehead or on the hand, he, too, will drink of the wine of God's fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. He will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment rises for ever and ever. There is no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and his image, or for anyone who receives the mark of his name."

Will you have the power to resist the Mark of the Beast when the time comes?

There are some who will.

Only those who have Jesus will have the power to resist when that day comes. I urge you to invite Him into your life today.....

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1049/1049_01.asp

The NSA's Black Widow Is Watching ALL Your Calls & Emails

The NSA has a massive supercomputer called "The Black Widow" that watches millions of domestic and international phone calls and emails every single day. It is watching your electronic communications constantly and it may be aware that you are reading this article right now.

That sounds like a plot from a Bourne movie doesn't it?

But it's not.

It's real.

On October 26th, the Baltimore Sun's national security correspondent, David Wood wrote the following about the constant spying the NSA is doing: "The NSA's colossal Cray supercomputer, code-named the 'Black Widow,' scans millions of domestic and international phone calls and e-mails every hour. . . . The Black Widow, performing hundreds of trillions of calculations per second, searches through and reassembles key words and patterns, across many languages."

Perhaps you were still under the illusion that your phone calls and emails were private.

Perhaps it horrifies you to think that someone out there could be laughing at the intimate things you have said or written to those close to you.

Perhaps you think a whistle blower would have come forward by now to try to stop this.

One whistle blower did.

A former AT&T technician, Mark Klein, discovered a secret AT&T room which the NSA was using to tap into the telecom giant's fiber optic cables.

On National Public Radio on November 7, 2007, Klein said this: "It's not just AT&T's traffic going through these cables, because these cables connected AT&T's network with other networks."

According to Klein, the NSA's equipment "just copies the entire data without any selection going on. So it's a complete copy of the data stream."

The reality is that the NSA looks at everything.

The reality is that the NSA looks at all of YOUR stuff.

After all, you could be a terrorist.

James Bamford, the author of the fascinating new study of the National Security Agency entitled "The Shadow Factory" says that the NSA has "the capacity to make tyranny total in America. Only law ensures that we never fall into that abyss."

So is this the new America?

An America where the government watches everything that you say and do?

It reminds us of the lyrics from that old Alan Parsons Project song entitled "Eye In The Sky".....

I am the eye in the sky
Looking at you
I can read your mind
I am the maker of rules
Dealing with fools
I can cheat you blind
And I don't need to see any more
To know that
I can read your mind